Comments on: Vote: Should points be deducted when players show dissent?

By: RedbyDawn

RedbyDawn — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:06:44 +0000

Do you reckon Bradley was searching for a clue for his dad when he was going through them waitresses handbags?

Stupid cunt. He’s writing in the Scum; says it all.

By: Dusty

Dusty — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:56:53 +0000

Ian Wright always was a thick fucker, how does he get paid for writing that stuff!! got to have some controversy on a pitch or as ham says it will be capuccinos at arsenal watching gaydivers.com every week, must have the villains and shit refs to make it all worthwhile watching every week!

By: RedMist

RedMist — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:16:50 +0000

Eastwood and Hamburgler: “I shit in your your milk”

By: Hamburgler

Hamburgler — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:16:21 +0000

All this complaining about dissent is ridiculous. Points deductions – lipreading – whatever. What a load of bollocks. Just another example of attempts to gentrify our football league out of all recognition so it becomes like a circus act with wel trained clowns. Even WWF needs villains and heroes so dont be too harsh on the Mascheranos and JT’s or we’ll lose them aand all have a nice pretty game to watch while we drink our capucinnos at the Emirates

By: Eastwood

Eastwood — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:09:43 +0000

All ‘lovable’ wrighty did all game long was swear like a mofo at every ref. The more of a ‘celebrity’ he became the more he swore and shouted to use his influence to chnage the course of the game.

By: Noel - Malta

Noel - Malta — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:10:37 +0000

If points were to be deducted than Chelsea would be relegated by Christmas. Much of today’s dissent starting when the SPECIAL ONE took over Chelsea. Other teams seeing that it worked started to do it. Apart from Cole last week, remember the game at Anfield, where the ref was constantly being surrounded and last year’s game against Arsenal?