<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spoiler&#8217;s top ten Premiership games of 2008/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/</link>
	<description>World&#039;s Best Football Gossip &#124; Transfer Rumours &#124; Premier League News &#124; WAGs &#124; Celebrity Footballers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie the K</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84810</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84810</guid>
		<description>Agree on #1, but your #4 should have been second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree on #1, but your #4 should have been second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reD</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84804</link>
		<dc:creator>reD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 10:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84804</guid>
		<description>While I acknowledge that United have a better group of players, I think this list proves that the better side hasn&#039;t won the title this year. Liverpool have been by far the best team to watch this year, and I&#039;m gutted that hasn&#039;t resulted in the title. Oh well, there&#039;s always next year...

Come on Barca!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I acknowledge that United have a better group of players, I think this list proves that the better side hasn&#8217;t won the title this year. Liverpool have been by far the best team to watch this year, and I&#8217;m gutted that hasn&#8217;t resulted in the title. Oh well, there&#8217;s always next year&#8230;</p>
<p>Come on Barca!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84783</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 02:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84783</guid>
		<description>exactly, luke. man utd are pro efficient. other teams just give up against them. thats why when they lose, it becomes exciting.  

boro beating liverpool - all i can remember is that boro beat liverpool. nothing top ten about that.

i dont like the 6-0. man utd - villa. would have been the obvious better choice. although, i dont get the 0-0. maybe i didn&#039;t watch it. otherwise a good enough list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly, luke. man utd are pro efficient. other teams just give up against them. thats why when they lose, it becomes exciting.  </p>
<p>boro beating liverpool &#8211; all i can remember is that boro beat liverpool. nothing top ten about that.</p>
<p>i dont like the 6-0. man utd &#8211; villa. would have been the obvious better choice. although, i dont get the 0-0. maybe i didn&#8217;t watch it. otherwise a good enough list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84782</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84782</guid>
		<description>The 5 - 2 against the Spurs wasn&#039;t entertaining, a team crumbled to pieces of what they were in the first half.  And like that, most ManU wins are the same, not really exciting since the other team can&#039;t do much against their squad.
Otherwise, when they lose, it means the other team played exceptionally well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 5 &#8211; 2 against the Spurs wasn&#8217;t entertaining, a team crumbled to pieces of what they were in the first half.  And like that, most ManU wins are the same, not really exciting since the other team can&#8217;t do much against their squad.<br />
Otherwise, when they lose, it means the other team played exceptionally well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haycomel</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84778</link>
		<dc:creator>haycomel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84778</guid>
		<description>Emm..how about  when Mboro beat Lfc 2-0!! It&#039;s much more exciting since Mboro was at bottom of the table at that time(even now~~struggling at the relegation zone)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emm..how about  when Mboro beat Lfc 2-0!! It&#8217;s much more exciting since Mboro was at bottom of the table at that time(even now~~struggling at the relegation zone)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84684</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84684</guid>
		<description>man utd-villa should be there instead of man city portsmouth 6-0. 
that one was boring after 2-0.the same way liverpool newcastle 5-1 was boring in the second half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man utd-villa should be there instead of man city portsmouth 6-0.<br />
that one was boring after 2-0.the same way liverpool newcastle 5-1 was boring in the second half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mizman</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84682</link>
		<dc:creator>Mizman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 02:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84682</guid>
		<description>WELL SAID SHAUN.........

are you watching merseyside?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL SAID SHAUN&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>are you watching merseyside?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barner</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809/#comment-84676</link>
		<dc:creator>barner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2009/05/15/the-spoilers-top-ten-premiership-games-of-200809#comment-84676</guid>
		<description>the #1 game shouldnt be at the top the man u 1-4 lfc should be first place as it was much more entertaining than the 4-4 one so many mistakes in that one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the #1 game shouldnt be at the top the man u 1-4 lfc should be first place as it was much more entertaining than the 4-4 one so many mistakes in that one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 261/262 objects using apc

Served from: www.thespoiler.co.uk @ 2013-05-20 02:32:38 -->