INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL

Five stats about this year’s Confederations Cup Final

USA/Brazil, Sunday 7.30pm, BBC Three, Betfair £25 Free Bet

The reaction of the American media to their national side ending Spain’s 35-game unbeaten streak may have been unbearable but it would have been just as bad – if not worse – over here if England had done it. The USA have made this pretty meaningless tournament worth watching and they will fancy their chances of winning it after seeing Brazil stumble past South Africa last night in the other semi-final. The bookies don’t though and some of the trends identified by our friends at chickendinner make it easy to see why:

1. Brazil have won 14 of their 15 matches against USA (one after extra-time). The USA’s one win over the holders came in the 1998 Gold Cup Final, with former Everton winger Predrag “Preki” Radosavljevic scoring the winner.

2. USA haven’t scored against Brazil in three previous Confederations Cup meetings, with Dunga’s side beating them 1-0 in 1999 and 2003 and winning 3-0 against them last Thursday.

3. Bob Bradley’s side haven’t won any of their last six games against South American opposition, losing five and failing to score in three of the last four.

4. Confederations Cup finals involving Brazil are never short of goals. Their three finals to date have produced 18 goals – an average of six a game.

5. Holders Brazil last attempted to retain the cup in 1999 and on that occasion they reached the final only to lose to the CONCACAF Gold Cup winner – Mexico – in the final. USA are the reigning Gold Cup champions.


2 responses so far
  • Silvia // June 26, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Though USA had won Spain -I’m still wondering why…- the Americans will not win the match against Brazil. It’s just unthinkable.

  • John // June 29, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    pretty meaningless tournament ? Apart the WC, what is more meaningful than that in international football? You have the best teams of each Football Confederation…Oh yes, it would be much more meaningful if England were involved (after all, they won the WC 43 yers ago) but they were not good enough to even qualify for the Euros.

Leave a comment
  1. View comments in RSS feed