Comments on: Chelsea should have stuck with me, purrs Mourinho

By: TB

TB — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:07:50 +0000

Interview never happened. English “media” doing what they do best- fabricating stories.

By: Ted

Ted — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:38:04 +0000

What I am saying is that he joins teams that are sure to win trophies which most of us could do, let him try winning torphies with lets say above average teams like Birimingam, Everton, Fulham, want happen gauranteed.

By: Norman

Norman — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:29:54 +0000

Ted – Aside from six trophies in three seasons at Chelsea he’s managed to win the league, cup, UEFA cup and Champions league with Porto and now Serie A with Inter. In fact with three different clubs, in three different countries he has not had a season without trophies for eight years. That’s one hell of a hoax…….

By: Ted

Ted — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:02:40 +0000

feel sorry for you guys that you cannot see through this hoax of a man. Thank you God for granting me a little bit of wisdom.

By: Lorelei

Lorelei — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:01:08 +0000

Mourinho was the best manager Chelsea ever had. Hiddinck was 2nd, Ancelotti reminds me of Ranieri. Wish Mourinho was back. Hope to god L’poo and ManUre don’t get him.

By: Ted

Ted — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:35:44 +0000

My view on Mourinho is that I always suspected him of being a bit of a conman, he will always join teams that are already successful or on the verge of becoming successful, that way he cant go wrong much.

By: Norman

Norman — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:18:37 +0000

Rob – Chelsea played some of the best football seen at Stamford Bridge in Mourinho’s first two seasons with Duff and Robben out wide. Also, I’m not sure why you think Chelsea would be in more debt but if it’s relating to buying players then you need to consider how many were bought before his arrival. Didn’t really think this one through did you?

By: rob

rob — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:11:59 +0000

Besides playing ugly football Chelsea would have been in more debt now had Mourinho stayed