<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Board says NO to play-offs &#8211; thanks a lot, Big Four!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four/</link>
	<description>World&#039;s Best Football Gossip &#124; Transfer Rumours &#124; Premier League News &#124; WAGs &#124; Celebrity Footballers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four/#comment-144373</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four#comment-144373</guid>
		<description>Why should we gamble with the intention of fielding our fourth best side in the Champions League, just so Spurs, Villa and the rest can get themselves excited for an extra fortnight?
Why don&#039;t we just put forward the four league champions? Premiership, Championship, League One and League Two? This is almost just as logical. All teams would like their mitts on some Champions League kitty, too.. Not just sides from 5th to 8th.

My side qualified for the Champions League by finishing 2nd, 3rd and 3rd again on occasions. We aren&#039;t part of &quot;The Big Four&quot;. Showing it can be done without trying to hijack the entire structure of Premiership football in order to meet your apparent demands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should we gamble with the intention of fielding our fourth best side in the Champions League, just so Spurs, Villa and the rest can get themselves excited for an extra fortnight?<br />
Why don&#8217;t we just put forward the four league champions? Premiership, Championship, League One and League Two? This is almost just as logical. All teams would like their mitts on some Champions League kitty, too.. Not just sides from 5th to 8th.</p>
<p>My side qualified for the Champions League by finishing 2nd, 3rd and 3rd again on occasions. We aren&#8217;t part of &#8220;The Big Four&#8221;. Showing it can be done without trying to hijack the entire structure of Premiership football in order to meet your apparent demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fucker</title>
		<link>http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four/#comment-144306</link>
		<dc:creator>Fucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thespoiler.co.uk/index.php/2010/03/04/board-says-no-to-play-offs-thanks-big-four#comment-144306</guid>
		<description>Fuck playoffs. This would infest the champions league with shit teams and the countries with normal top groups will have greater chance of winning. Fuck the fuckers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck playoffs. This would infest the champions league with shit teams and the countries with normal top groups will have greater chance of winning. Fuck the fuckers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Object Caching 195/196 objects using apc

Served from: www.thespoiler.co.uk @ 2013-05-21 22:17:18 -->