Comments on: Erm, yeah, we’ll have Joe Hart back now, suggest Man City

By: Rizpah

Rizpah — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:32:20 +0000

The contracts of PL football players are governed by FA rules and the terms of individual contracts-in that order.

If PL rules do not forbid the variation of loan agreements, then it is a matter for the parent club and the loan club to come to an arrangement. Nothing wrong in that if you subscribe to a free-market.

By: John Swaine

John Swaine — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:33:02 +0000

One rule for them, One rule for us.

What a joke. How many times have we seen other teams smacked around with injuy crises? Even in the goalkeeper position.

City HAVE a senior Goalkeeper – they just seem to think that the fact that he’s utter wank is reason enough to be allowed to sign another one.

I didn’t see Hull being allowed to buy other players because the ones left in that role were crap.

Worst comes to worse you’d play someone out of position. They don’t even need to do that because they still have a Senior Keeper on their books.

Utter garbage.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:06:10 +0000

The contract rules state he can’t be recalled.. Spurs went week with players out injured when we have perfect cover on loan… Why should city be aloud to bring players back when spurs not????

By: pedmachine

pedmachine — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:52:31 +0000

Well, Mr Spoiler…at the end of the day it is a loan. Do the master class of the banking fraternity not call in their loans when there is trouble ahead? Well the master class of football ownership should do precisely that. Joe can catapult City to the Champions League and himself to South Africa.