The Big Question
Hmm, does Denilson have a point about Fabregas?
It’s all been swept under the carpet now, with Cesc Fabregas insisting on Twitter that it was all just a big “misunderstanding” when Denilson stood in front of a journalist’s dictaphone quite clearly articulating that his captain, Cesc Fabregas, was NOT A VERY GOOD LEADER.
Sorry, slipped on the Caps Lock there. Anyway, yes, does he have a point? Let us know your thoughts with a vote and a comment…
Jan
19
3 responses so far
Chris // January 19, 2011 at 5:47 pm
Fabregas doesn’t just change a game by his presence and performance, his presence on the pitch changes his team mates’ performances as well. I think that’s a fairly good indication that he is a good leader.
Dave // January 20, 2011 at 8:22 am
He’s the best player on his club, and is very often the best player on any pitch he steps onto. Of course he raises the game of those around him. I think that being a good LEADER, though, means more than that. He must inspire his team mates even when he’s having an off day, or in the dressing room, or something like that. Only Arsenal players/staff can know how he does with that sort of stuff, so I don’t see how any of us can judge.
Gery // January 21, 2011 at 6:17 pm
Fabregas is the best that Arsenal has right now. On his leadership, how can you say he is not a good captain when 81% of Arsenal games are won by The Gunners when El Capitano scores? That proves that he could spread positive influence to his team mates, which is necessary for a captain, and he knows that he has some responsibility to his team when he is on the pitch.
Leave a comment