The Spoiler
The Spoiler

Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring

September 22nd, 2008 · 1 Comment

The Spoiler

Worst decision ever? Yes, worst decision ever

Conventionally, goals are awarded when the ball crosses the line and ends in the net bit. Assistant referee Nigel Bannister, however, took an unusual approach this weekend when he awarded Reading a goal for an attempt that went at least two yards wide.

As you can see above, referee Stuart Attwell chose not to trust his own eyes and acquiesced to the linesman’s belief that John Eustace’s clearance ended up in the net. The Watford midfielder ended up with his first career own goal, and Reading went on to earn a 2-2 draw at an angry Vicarage Road.

While the linesman’s decision was very poor, Reading’s unsporting decision to carry on without giving Watford an opportunity to equalise is surely a much bigger mistake.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

del.icio.us:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring digg:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring spurl:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring wists:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring simpy:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring newsvine:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring blinklist:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring furl:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring reddit:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring fark:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring blogmarks:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring Y!:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring smarking:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring magnolia:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring segnalo:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring gifttagging:Video: Reading awarded a goal without scoring

Posted: September 22nd, 2008 by Ryan Bailey



1 response so far

  • 1 Honest Abe // Sep 22, 2008 at 1:40 pm

    I wonder if that old fool Blatter will still say goal line tech is pointless now?

View comments in RSS feed

CAPTCHA image